Forward-looking movement triggers
Every score ships with a written-down answer: what would move this tool up, and what would move it down. Not 'watch for changes' — specific, falsifiable thresholds.
As of June 12, 2026· 2 promotions, 3 declines, 1 new this cycle
Six-dimension, evidence-graded scoring of agentic developer tools. We publish a written movement trigger for every score, so readers know what would move a tool up or down before it happens. Refreshed weekly, with caps and rationale public, and willing to flag negative signals that vendor-curated landscapes will not.
Most landscapes show you what exists. We show you what is shifting and what would shift it next. Three primitives keep the radar from drifting into commodity territory.
Every score ships with a written-down answer: what would move this tool up, and what would move it down. Not 'watch for changes' — specific, falsifiable thresholds.
Eighteen named, numbered caps mechanically bound dimension scores. When governance is capped at 12, the cap ID is listed and the rule is public. Auditable, not hand-wavy.
Every tool carries an Evidence Grade (A/B/C) reflecting hands-on vs. research depth. Vendor-only benchmarks get labeled. The grade tells you how much weight to put on the call.
Rating changes vs. the 2026-05-28 snapshot
Latest briefing
The week the partner/competitor line stopped being a metaphor. Microsoft shipped seven first-party MAI frontier models (Project Polaris becomes Copilot's August default) while Anthropic filed for a ~$1T IPO — our platform partner now competes with our anchor vendor while still...
Parallel coordinates of all tools across the six dimensions
Browse and filter tools by signal level, category, or score
Industry timeline: model releases, funding, governance events
Programmatic access via the Model Context Protocol
Weekly briefings and the latest digest in long-form
Follow the radar
Weekly briefings and signal-level changes. Subscribe via RSS or check back Mondays.